Monday, September 29, 2008

End of Capitalism?

Donnchadh Ó Laoghaire
Oifigeach Oideachas
Ógra Shinn Féin

These last few weeks, we have seen an absolute sea change in the financial markets. The nationalisation of Annie Mac and Fannie Mae in the U.S., of Northern Rock in Britain, and the collapse of Lehman Brothers; all these things have collectively illustrated that everything has changed. All the old certainties are gone. From a leftist point of view, one is tempted to feel a certain degree of satisfaction at this complete and utter failure of the free market.

But such satisfaction would be misplaced. As always, the worker will be asked to prop up the banks, as there is realistically, little other option. Difficult times are ahead for us all. But draw comfort from this.

There is now the gap there for a new politics to emerge. This is an opportunity for Sinn Féin, and it’s like worldwide, to put forward its economic vision with confidence. This is an opportunity which must be grasped. Because if nothing else, then at least this last month has finally nailed the myth that capitalism works.

These are the opinions of a diverse group of Socialist figures, about what this crash means, and whats its effects on the left will be. Please leave a comment or two, let us know what your thoughts on this crisis are.


Daniel Cohn-Bendit
Student leader in Student Movement in Paris 1968

This financial crisis is for capitalist neo-liberals what Chernobyl was for the nuclear lobby. It's a catastrophe. I hope we all learn lessons from it. But am I optimistic that we will? That's another question. To think that the biggest neo-liberal nation in the world would start nationalising banks ... we're rubbing our eyes in disbelief.

It's not the end of capitalism because capitalism has always had the intelligence to reform itself. It will be the end of capitalism when it's incapable of reforming. However, the belief that the market is god is over.

It must now be regulated.

We fought for 20 years to bring attention to climate change. It took us a while, but we were right. This crisis will help us in our arguments for sustainable development - that we need a balance between the environment, society and the economy - but I get no joy from it; it saddens me deeply. Ordinary people lose everything, while the big bankers themselves walk away with millions.


Jarvis Cocker
Singer with the band Pulp, and now in his own right. Well known for his socialist attitudes, best exemplified in the song 'Common People'

It's really nice seeing capitalism getting its comeuppance. It had gone too far: I think most people can understand capitalism when it's about companies that make real products, but when it's about organisations that just make money ... that's abstract capitalism, it's beyond most ordinary people - and I include myself among them. I mean, you see the FTSE index, or whatever, running along the bottom of the TV screen and generally it just doesn't impinge at all on the way you live your life, and then suddenly you're told your life is going to take a nosedive.

Who understands that?

The truly sad thing is that all this is taking place with a so-called Labour government in power, a government that should have the interests of the majority at heart, but has instead played the role of a pimp.

Maybe a bit of a recession will do us some good. A lot of people have been living beyond their means. We've all done it, I've done it: you feel a bit depressed, you go and buy something. People might now actually talk to each other a bit more, make their own entertainment, all those other great northern cliches. The tragedy is that it will be the ordinary people who will bear the brunt. The guys who are responsible may have to sell the yacht.


Salma Yaqoob
Birmingham City councillor Salma Yaqoob is the vice chair of Respect - The Unity Coalition and a Birmingham City Councillor.

This crisis opens up possibilities for alternative economic models as the wheels come off this one, but I'm worried about the immediate social consequences. A leaked report from the Home Office a couple of weeks ago referred to a rise in racism and social tensions. My concern is that we'll now see some ugly racist scapegoating as politicians try to pass the buck.

When the markets were being treated as gods, we were always being promised that there'd be a trickle-down of prosperity. But all that's trickled down has been a greed-is-good philosophy. The consequence is a more unequal, self-centred, crueller Britain. It's important that we should reflect on the kind of society we've become, but also on the kind of society we want to be. Recently, Unicef reported that Britain's children are the unhappiest in Europe, and I think that is not unconnected to an economic climate that forces parents to work longer and longer hours.

We hear a lot of talk about youth and gangs and guns; what we don't talk about are the economic policies that would allow families to nurture each other and make young people feel valued.

The very people for whom it was a sacred othodoxy that there should be no government intervention are now coming to the government on their hands and knees begging for assistance. But what about the government intervening on behalf of ordinary people? Why not do something literally concrete on the ground and start building cheaper social housing? Why not put people at the centre of things?


Ken Livingstone

Former Labour Mayor of London

Sadly, I don't think this will be the end of capitalism. But there is going to have to be a return to a much, much more interventionist state. As a system for the distribution and exchange of goods, you can't beat the market. But the mistake a lot of politicians have made is to think that because the market was good at that, it could be good at everything: it could train workers, create infrastructure, protect the environment, regulate itself. Quite obviously, it can't.

So the real issue is, what sort of international structures do we need to ensure this never happens again? Thatcher and Reagan deregulated massively and let the financial markets do as they liked - and they've turned into one bloody great big rip-off. The good news is, there'll now be a realisation - even George Bush sees this now - that we need international regulatory mechanisms that will ensure, for example, that these people and operations actually pay tax. There'll be a realisation in Britain that while it's certainly useful to host a world financial centre, it has to rest on a solid, genuinely productive real economy. In China now they make things; we've decided we're not interested in that.

Ken Loach
Socialist Film director, best known for the films Kes, Bread and Roses, and particularly in an Irish context, The Wind That Shakes The Barley

This is further evidence, if any were needed, of the fact that the market is not and never can be the answer. (The need to pursue illegal wars is pretty strong evidence too, of course.) You look around the world and you see massive need on the one hand, and massive wealth on the other, and the two never connect. The market is massively inefficient, capitalism is massively unstable and turbulent, and it's insane that we are all bound to this terrible wheel of instability.

The real left is making a lot of noise about this. There'll be a convention of the left during the Labour party conference, all the shades of genuine leftwing opinion, and we'll be hammering all these questions out from a socialist perspective. But if the papers and the broadcasters fail to record it, it's very difficult for these ideas to penetrate the public consciousness. The media just turns a deaf ear; it chooses not to hear it. It's a lot more interested in the careerism of whoever's after Gordon Brown's job.

Will this be a defining moment for the left? It should be, of course but it's very difficult to be optimistic given our history of failure. The war against Iraq was a massive opportunity to create a coherent anti-capitalist movement, to find a real socialist alternative, and we let it slip through our fingers. This is another such opportunity, and we must not let it go.

Michel Onfray
French Philosopher, known for his Social Libertarian Attitudes

Is this the end of capitalism? Absolutely not. The key feature of capitalism is that it's malleable. It has been through antiquity, feudalism, the industrial era, it has worn the guise of fascism and now it's wedding itself to the ecology cause.

After this latest event, it will take on a new form. It is indestructible and works like the Hydra of Lerne, cut off one head and another grows in its place. Is this the end of society's obsession with money and credit? Not at all.

Chris Harman
Socialist Workers Party Of Britain, and author of 'The Fire Last Time'

This is a very, very serious crisis of capitalism: it has been the build-up of private borrowing that has kept the system going, and it's coming unstuck. The whole system is unwinding; the other day we saw the biggest nationalisation in the history of humanity and that still wasn't enough.

Governments don't know what to do, and it's the rest of us who have to live with the consequences. The Labour party is offering no alternative, the Lib Dems are offering no alternative, the Conservatives are offering no alternative.

This could be a big moment for the left. But we really need to stand up and use the 'c' word, say this is a crisis of capitalism and that people are suffering. The thing is, all the media coverage yesterday was of the bankers leaving Lehman Brothers with their boxes, but the people who will really be hit are the cleaners, the secretaries - what did we see of them? We have to build resistance. Because so far we've only seen the minor problems; people stuck in foreign airports or having a bit of trouble getting a job. Things are going to get much, much worse.

George Monbiot
Green campaigner, Columnist and Leftist Academic

It's only in times of crisis that people are prepared to contemplate taking to the streets. It was noticeable that there were a lot more protests - against road developments, for instance, and against the Criminal Justice Act and other infringements of civil rights - in the wake of the 1991 recession than there were in the mid-90s, when people were feeling richer.

Some people, faced with recession, tend to hunker down, but others confront the government and demand a better deal, and that gives the left hope.

A Keynesian solution along the lines of Roosevelt's New Deal could deliver many of the things that the left is calling for - more public spending, more training and education. I'm particularly interested in the idea of a green new deal, which would employ large numbers of people to insulate homes and carry out major environmental works. Remember that the central plank in the New Deal was the Civilian Conservation Corps, which employed three million people.

It is striking that the left has been slow to capitalise on the situation. There is now a good opportunity to build a common front between trade unions, disillusioned labour voters, greens and people who feel that their economic position is slipping.

Max Keiser
Former broker, now a 'financial activist'and presenter of The Truth About Markets on Resonance FM

This is not a blip. It's extremely significant. We will see a shift in power away from the US, and towards the developing world - to countries such as Brazil and the Gulf states that have commodities to sell, and to China, where the savings ratio is high. We are going to see a new world order. America as a driver of the global economy is finished.

The left has nothing to say about any of this. And because the left has no economic programme, we will see the rise of social unrest. We are already seeing it in the US. The left has no real response to that either.

Tony Benn
Former Labour Minister and Political Writer

I remember the 1930s. What the Depression did then was to stimulate antisemitism. I met Oswald Mosley in 1928 when he was a Labour MP. The next time I met him he was wearing a blackshirt. Where there is fear, there is scapegoating, and that is very dangerous.

Blair and Brown based their politics on a belief in the market: the market answered all your needs and the state had to be kept out. That confidence has now collapsed and New Labour is seen for what it is. You can't, as New Labour believed, nurse capitalism.

I believe a new labour movement will emerge from this with a more realistic sense of how capitalism works. There is a left convention at this year's Labour conference, a sort of parallel conference. This year's Labour conference is the first in my lifetime when you will not be allowed to vote, so the left convention will get a lot of attention. At last, after a period when we've been told to trust the gamblers, there are many relevant ideas emerging on the left.

Lindsey German
Lindsey German is Convenor of the Stop the War Coalition and Left List candidate in this year's London Mayoral election

This growing crisis will mean misery for working people and shows that everything we've been told about the free market has been false. At the same time, it's a big opportunity. Millions of people will be questioning why this has happened, what's wrong with the system, is it 1929 all over again?

The left needs to put forward answers. People have the right to work; we have a housing crisis, so why not employ people to build more houses? We are facing great challenges, but there is also a historic opportunity for the left to remake itself. Capitalism has had its chance and failed; now it's socialism's turn.

Sheila Rowbotham
Sheila Rowbotham is Socialist, Feminist and professor of gender and labour history at Manchester University

In the late 19th century and also in the 1930s, the impact of depression made people begin to question whether the free market and a completely unfettered form of capitalism was the best form of organising society. In both periods it encouraged on the left the idea of a complete social transformation through revolution, and also encouraged people to devise various schemes for social reform.

The problem now - unlike in the 1880s, when people discovered the ideas of socialism, and in the 1930s, when it seemed that communism was the solution - is that the left doesn't have a coherent alternative vision.

The Labour party has always been ambiguous about whether it is trying to make capitalism more efficient, or whether it is trying to soften its harshness. Since the 1970s, the left has been much weakened, as neoliberal ideas became totally ascendent. Under Blair, the idea that the Labour party was committed to any redistribution was pushed to the sidelines. I would like to see a new kind of left - a left that would relate to the present predicament.

There is a consensus forming that says an unregulated financial system is a disaster, but whether that new left can be formed is questionable. I'd be very glad to see it happen.

George Galloway
Controversial Respect MP for Bethnal And Bow Green

I think the end of capitalism will be a process, not a single event. But each event we've seen so far has gone deeper than people have predicted, and we don't know how deep this one will go. It could well be that it marks the collapse of at least a major section of the capitalist economy: the financialisation of the economy that has been powering ahead since the deregulation and neo-liberalisation of the Thatcher-Reagan years.

As far as the left is concerned, well, the Liberal Democrats have effectively moved to the right in the face of this week's events, and New Labour, with a few honourable exceptions, abandoned that territory a very long time ago.

Now I would have thought - in fact, I know - that among the public in general there is a much bigger and a much wider audience for progressive ideas than there has been for some time. But what the left still has to overcome is its inability to speak in a language that ordinary people can understand. And to stop arguing about dead Russians.

Hari Kunzru
Novelist

I'm in New York right now and the feeling here is quite visibly one of panic. I've just met, quite randomly, three people who were helping their friends clear their desks.

Apparently, 12,000 jobs went, just like that, and Wall Street represents 20% of the city's jobs and something like 90% its tax base. So there's a definite sense here of systemic crisis.

I don't immediately expect to be living in some kind of Mad Max world. But this could be the death knell of the time when we were all singing the beauties of free-market capitalism.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

very interesting, i agree for def that now is the time for us to be raising alternative socialist ideas and models in as many public forums as possible.
senan.

Anonymous said...

A rag-bag collection of failed journalists and singers.

I can't help noticing that there is not a single economist here, though.

Just a bunch of people that are rich enough not to have to fear what socialism would do to them.

hallblithe said...

Readers wanting a revolutionary socialist perspective on this article should us the link below:

http://tinyurl.com/4qhwes

faceless said...

interesting read, thanks

Anonymous said...

I don't see the failure of the Neoliberal system as a crisis what so ever. It is a prime opportunity for the left to push their economic agendas in governments.
In the case of Ireland we need, I think, to go back to Import Substitution Industrialisation to rebuild our indigenous industries and only trade bilaterally or multilaterally for the raw materils we don't have.

Anonymous said...

I hope the 1st poster isn't referring to Donnchadh as part of 'a rag bag collection of failed journalists and singers' :)

Joe

Anonymous said...

http://ablog.typepad.com/keytrendsinglobalisation

Above is a link to very good blog and articles on the current economic crisis, written by Ken Livingston's key former economics advisor.

It may be of interest or useful. J

Anonymous said...

And what exactly would socialism do to them? You think that there is only one form of economic system and no one should dare utter the 's' word.

Anonymous said...

'Fear what Socialism would do to them!' What has Capitalism done for people of course Socialism is the only alternative. Look closely at Socailist states eg Cuba and how
much better the quality of life is!

The objective of the article is to discuss the failing international system and the 'failed jounralists and singers' are just examples to start debate. If you want to contribute do so productivity please.

Anonymous said...

Hey anonymous poster number 2. Smarting from your favourite economist getting it wrong? Something tells me that now the standard capitlist model seems to have gone off track a little all your books seem to be useless. It's time for ordinary people to start thinking and discussing economics rather than leaving it to a number of stuck up prats who only know their economcs from what the previous generation of stuck up prats taught hem in UCD. Get over it. Dan McLaughlin, Jim Power, Moore McDowell and their ilk can only guess at the future now cos it's not in any of their books. According to their script the market works and is unfailing...oops.